I'd rather have a low grade than no grade at all :D
the question was "Is Juan Nakpil deserving to be called our National artist?" with my research I learned the styles Juan Nakpil imposed in his structures and mostly are International/modern architecture and maybe that is why my professor gave us this question to ponder. If the architectural style used is in question maybe its not for us to judge and misudnerstand for each architect have their own styles like Leandro Locsin who's works are (Tanghalang Balagtas,PICC and CCP) who have the same style as Juan Nakpil modern, simple and boxed typed. The only difference is no one tried to ask why he is was proclaimed as National Artist for Architecture (1990) by Former President Corazon Aquino. So I decided to ask other people particularly my dad who's also an Architect I asked him if Juan Nakpils works are good and straight forward and in an instant he answered me yes and I asked him about his(Juan Nakpil) works and he mentioned me a number of structure he worked on like the Quiapo church and told me that his(Juan Nakpil) works are nice. I cant research more about Juan Nakpil in the net all the informations about him are limited on what will be the basis so we can say he's not deserving of his title.
Then let me just conclude this that we can say that Juan Nakpil is unlike Francisco Mañosa who embraced the culture of the filipino and placed it in his designs like the Coconut Palace but maybe and probably his works and him working for the Philippine Goverment/country is what caused him to be given that said award. He in some ways made/left a mark to the Filipino Architecture/people thats why?I dont know everything is based on my opinion and my dads. It still depends on the people and the wrong thing he/she sees at a person:)
but for me rather that making issues we should be proud and be thankful for his works.
PS:please look at my old post. I Know its late but I'd rather have a low grade than no grade at all. please and thank you